User talk:PiyushKhatri

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, PiyushKhatri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DMySon 09:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with your recent article List of accounts affected by Twitter fake followers purge

Hello! Regarding the article List of accounts affected by Twitter fake followers purge which you have just created, there are a number of issues you should be aware of:

Please do not copy & paste content from elsewhere (even if your own creation), as articles must follow WP's own formatting and layout guidelines. As the article creator, the primary onus is on you to ensure compliance.
The article has no internal wikilinks, and no inline citations to external sources, both of which are important requirements.
You appear to have a connection with the article subject, esp. a business mentioned in s.3. At the very least you should declare your interest, and preferably not make edits which could be seen as advertising, self-promotional or otherwise contradicting WP policies.
Finally, the article has been marked with a number of 'tags', and I noticed that you already removed one of these (which I subsequently reverted). Please do not remove tags without addressing the issues they highlight.

Please familiarise yourself with the relevant policies and guidelines, and feel free to continue editing your article in line with them. Regards, DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:20, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. -- Yamla (talk) 09:58, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Yamla. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, OnePlus Nord, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Yamla (talk) 09:58, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to WhatsApp, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 11:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Naming children and siblings

Note per WP:NONAME we should avoid naming non-notable children and siblings in biographical articles. This is for privacy reasons, and also WP:INDISCRIMINATE applies. Thanks. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 12:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto to that in the Gal Gadot article. Thanks, Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 16:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To repeat, we generally don't include names of non-notable children. This has been pointed out before, yet you seem to continue to add this content (which I'm removing). Please stop. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 22:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again, please do NOT name non-notable children, as you did at Gal Gadot. See WP:BLPNAME. Also, when adding material, you need to cite your sources. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 12:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PiyushKhatri:, you should really check your talk page messages. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 13:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been notified and warned numerous times about this, PiyushKhatri. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 15:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"In use" template

Please don't add the {{In use}} template to articles indicating that "this article is actively undergoing a major edit for a short while" when you only intend to carry out one small edit. Thanks, Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 16:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please see WP:BLPNAME, especially Names of family members who are not also notable public figures must be removed from an article if they are not properly sourced. So please do not add the names of children, and please do read referencing for beginners. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 15:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Drew Scott. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

@PiyushKhatri: As repeatedly advised, please see WP:BLPNAME, especially Names of family members who are not also notable public figures must be removed from an article if they are not properly sourced. So please do not add the names of children, and please do read referencing for beginners. And please read these talk page messages. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 08:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You've been warned enough. Final time. ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the edits have abruptly ceased today, but I have an AN/I report ready to file if this continues, especially if PiyushKhatri remains uncommunicative. I'm not even sure if they know about user talk page messages and reversion notifications. They do speak English. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 13:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 13:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PiyushKhatri (talk) 10:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PiyushKhatri (talk) 11:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PiyushKhatri:, if you do not communicate and use your talk page for constructive reasons, then your talk page editing permission may be revoked as well. If you wish to be unblocked, then use the "unblock" template as shown above. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 11:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PiyushKhatri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've understood my mistakes and I will make sure not to make them again. And I wasn't aware of the user talk page and guidelines of Wikipedia. So please let me fix this mistake.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 09:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

PiyushKhatri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for the blunder I made wasn't aware of user talk pages and things about Wikipedia but now I understand and promise you that I won't repeat the mistakes again even will give the good and useful contributions it would be great if you gave me one chance.PiyushKhatri (talk) 10:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I am unblocking you because it appears that you understand the reason for the block. I strongly advise you to review the BLP policy. Please feel free to post questions on my talk page going forward. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 13:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What mistakes have you made? Please tell so that we know you understand. 331dot (talk) 13:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I understand the mistakes that I made are-

I tried to copy & paste the content, but there is no internal linking in my content, my content seems promotional, hasn't provided reliable resources, included names of non-notable children, usage of an In-Use template, and hasn't seen my user talk page but I must say I wasn't aware of it. I accept maybe I made some other mistakes but it would be great if you tell me the left one I was new and wasn't aware of this but surely will learn things and won't repeat the mistakes again. I promise if you give me one last chance it will be worth PiyushKhatri (talk) 09:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not every statement needs to be an unblock request- only one open request is needed at a time. Subsequent comments should be standard, unformatted comments like this. I've removed the formatting from your above comment.

Editing about living people is harder than editing about topics other than living people, as sourcing requirements are stricter for living people, please see the biographies of living persons policy. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand what yo want to say what else I can do to get unblocked? PiyushKhatri (talk) 11:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]