Jump to content

User talk:Pkbwcgs/Archive/June 2018

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.


21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of British Rail Class 700

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article British Rail Class 700 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RonaldDuncan -- RonaldDuncan (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi I have carried out a review, and have a number of minor improvements that I have suggested. Please let me know when you have a chance to look.RonaldDuncan (talk) 15:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@RonaldDuncan: Hi. I carried out some minor improvements to the article including fixing a bare URL and adding a link. I will continue to check this article. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

thanks for the changes. Just ran the link checker Some are broken see https://dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=British_Rail_Class_700 RonaldDuncan (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC) PS some of the issues are just bugs in the linkchecker :( RonaldDuncan (talk) 16:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@RonaldDuncan: I have pressed 'fix dead links' on the view history page so I'm hoping most of them should get fixed by InternetArchiveBot. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
With that edit, four links have been fixed but there are still a few dead links that have been detected by link checker which haven't been fixed. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:10, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
@Pkbwcgs: Thanks for the changes ref 14 ( ref name="bom" / ) still has links to rail.co which is now a spam site. There is also the link to the archived version of the article, please can you remove the links to the originalRonaldDuncan (talk) 11:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
@RonaldDuncan:  Done Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
@Pkbwcgs: Thanks for the article I have reviewed it as a good article. ( I put back in the bom link but with the archive links :) ) RonaldDuncan (talk) 17:56, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
@RonaldDuncan: Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of British Rail Class 700

The article British Rail Class 700 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:British Rail Class 700 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RonaldDuncan -- RonaldDuncan (talk) 18:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Australian road articles using deprecated parameters

Thanks for your interest in fixing deprecated parameters. I have actually reverted your three edits that removed |length_rnd=, as in those cases (road lengths greater than 10 mi) it isn't actually deprecated – the tracking was temporary to see how it was being used, and probably should have both used a separate category, and been removed much sooner than just now (which was my fault, since I was the one who added it). Thanks again, - Evad37 [talk] 01:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Evad37: Thanks for flagging this up. I thought of using AWB for this task but I held back because I didn't want to mess it up so I tried seeing if manual fixing it would work but if it didn't that's fine. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

21:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Pkbwcgs/Archive, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

  • As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
  • Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 100 review coin, 250 review coin, 500 review coin, 1000 review certificate.
  • Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

21:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Self-cleaning cats

Just as felines clean themselves, so Wikipedia cleanup categories do the same. It was totally unnecessary to send this and this to WP:CfD - by some mechanism that I do not understand, they seem to send themselves to CAT:CSD when they become empty. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:51, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

@RHaworth: Yesterday, the categories I sent for deletion were tagged for six years. Surely, this can't be right. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
No, they were not tagged for that long. Maintenance categories use Template:Monthly clean-up category, and they are automatically marked as G6 when they become empty. Primefac (talk) 15:26, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
@Primefac: Understood. I am still going through clean-up categories and found Category:Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention from August 2007 which looks like it is automatically tagged. However, why are already deleted maintenance categories recreated by a bot? Also, when these categories are tagged for deletion, which category do they come into. I tried looking at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion but it is not there. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:32, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
It's a maintenance category. If there's a page in the category, the cat should exist. If there are no pages in the category, the cat should be deleted. The bot does this automatically so that users don't have to. See User:AnomieBOT#Current (DatedCategoryCreator) and the related BRFA. Primefac (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2018 (UTC)