User talk:Placebo effect

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Regarding edits made during November 2 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is not advertising. It's a link for the show that has useful information. I do not own the site nor control it.

It doesnt matter - its a non notable website. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but nowhere in that spam policy does it say that. This site is linked on IMDB, and is well known among fans. Just because you deem it non-notable does not necessarily mean it isn't. I don't mean to step on your toes, but it seems like you are arbitrarily deciding what is important and what isn't.

Getting a link on IMDb does not make you notable as it is very easy to get a link on IMDb.. please read WP:EL .. we dont include a link to every forum with wait for it.. a whole sixty users, 'mazing or what

thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen links for a lot less than that. This show has a small following and I thought it useful to add in information that might be of use to people. I had no ulterior motive behind it. I'm not sure who you are or what your role is on Wikipedia, but I don't mean to deface this article.

My primary concern with that link (I personally would not mind it if it didnt do this..) but it offers episodes to download.. which while I expect the website owner has good intentions violates US Copyright law.. Wikipedia is in the top 20 msot visited sites on the internet.. you can understand the implications of wikipedia linking to something which is not "legit" thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 23:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I see your point. I apologise for that, I didn't really pay much attention to that part. My bad.

Image tagging for Image:Miracle fortress.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Miracle fortress.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Polaris-related edits

Hi...please note that the article Feist is a disambiguation page, not an article about the Canadian singer. You need to link directly to Leslie Feist and use pipetext ([[Leslie Feist|Feist]]) when the singer is what you intend to link to. Thanks. Bearcat 03:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Close to paradise.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Close to paradise.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Five roses.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Five roses.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Miracle fortress.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Miracle fortress.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]