User talk:Procrustean

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Jean-Luc Baptiste

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Jean-Luc Baptiste, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Jean-Luc Baptiste. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Trugster 19:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The lap of luxury

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article The lap of luxury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:The lap of luxury. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Alvestrand 15:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Igor Igranovish Lenazov

A tag has been placed on Igor Igranovish Lenazov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Proofreader J-Man 05:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Growing Stone

A tag has been placed on The Growing Stone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 02:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Brianga (talk) 07:25, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, apparently, the first warning. Hmm.

Strange edit

Hi there. I noticed that you put the {{tfd}} template on the Threshold (online game) article. I'm not quite sure why you did this as the article isn't a template, so isn't eligible for TFD.

Considering there's some significant discussion underway, if your intent was to nominate it for deletion, it would be better if you participated in the discussion at Talk:Threshold (online game) first. Thanks! —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 18:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're exactly right. I found the page a little biased and wasn't sure it was a game really worth mentioning, and I wound up rushing into the fray. It won't happen again, but I will gladly join the discussion. Procrustean (talk) 19:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]