User talk:RutiWinkler

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Arifer per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arifer. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Trialpears (talk) 01:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RutiWinkler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is outrageous. I have been blocked for trying to prevent the vandalism by JoJo Anthrax. This person has been defaming and berating Ariel Fernandez for years using Wikipedia. He apparently censors anyone who seeks neutrality in the BLP with accusations of sockpuppetry. I am nobody's sock. RutiWinkler (talk) 12:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to SuLauMen. Yamla (talk) 12:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No reason for declining my unblock reprequest is give. This is completely arbitrary. RutiWinkler (talk) 15:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RutiWinkler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No reason for declining my unblock request is given. This is completely arbitrary. RutiWinkler (talk) 15:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not in the least bit arbitrary. Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RutiWinkler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no verified abuse of any account. This is all manipulated by JoJo Anthrax, person who vandalizes the BLP and defames Ariel Fernandez. RutiWinkler (talk) 20:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed this was a sock of a blocked editor. Removing talk page access. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is no verified abuse of any account. This is all manipulated by JoJo Anthrax, the main vandalizer of the BLP. RutiWinkler (talk) 20:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]