User talk:SalvatrixMundi

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Digoxindicarboxymethoxylamine moved to draftspace - unsourced

An article you recently created, Digoxindicarboxymethoxylamine, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Digoxindicarboxymethoxylamine

Hello, SalvatrixMundi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Digoxindicarboxymethoxylamine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IUPAC names from Pubchem

I note that you have recently swapped out the IUPAC name from molnupiravir, replacing what I added in this diff a few days ago with the latest Pubchem version. You'll note that what the article had before my change was a different Pubchem version which someone had commented about on the Talk Page. Pubchem generates its (alleged) IUPAC names programmatically and as a result the name tends to rely on a set of rules that are more often broken than actually useful. The most common problem is that the program doesn't name one compound as a derivative of a more familiar compound. I prefer to rely on Chemspider for IUPAC names, since they have expert validation in many cases (as for molnupiravir). I don't intend to make a fuss about this as we can probably count on the fingers of one hand Wikipedia readers who actually care about such names (and many chemboxes have a |PIN= as well as a |IUPAC_name= ) but if you were to revert your change or put in both I'd be grateful. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I listed both, from what I can tell cytidine is not a preferred name but I may be wrong, certainly both are valid! SalvatrixMundi (talk) 20:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Digoxindicarboxymethoxylamine

Hello, SalvatrixMundi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Digoxindicarboxymethoxylamine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]