User talk:Scorpion0422's PC Account

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Assessments

All of your assessments for Lost articles say that they're for The Simpsons. I just thought you should know before you keep going. Jackieboy87 (talk) 19:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It says it under the importance level. Jackieboy87 (talk) 19:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers

Please read WP:SPOIL. Thanks. –Turian (talk) 13:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am familiar with Wikipedia's policy, but a key part is that they need to be reliably sourced, and a fan report and video doesn't fall under that. Also WP:PW has it's own thing about spoilers, although that seems to change every time there's a title change at a taping. -- Scorpion0422 II (Talk) 13:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the heading that asks for you to reply here.

I added a source on the title page. Also, when you know it is a fact yet continue to revert it is seen as lazy. –Turian (talk) 13:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I only reverted you once. The other time was to fix some vandalism you blindly re-added. Perhaps you should check the history before accusing others. And again, that doesn't count as a reliable source because it is based on a fan report. -- Scorpion0422 II (Talk) 13:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Read the header on my talk page, which specifically asks you to respond here. You have ignored it twice. –Turian (talk) 13:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Scorpion0422's PC Account. You have new messages at Headbomb's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]