User talk:Seeger7

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Seeger7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! <-- the preceding is a canned message, but I am a real person and I do want to welcome you. Feel free to contact me anytime. I will "watchlist" here and might see a reply, but the best way to reach me for sure is at my Talk page.

I find my way to you by my watching AFDs, and I commented at the AFD you opened about the Moxie Media scandal article. At the moment I disagree with you about that article, but I appreciate that your nomination seems thoughtful and I hope the AFD discussion will be productive. I haven't really read the article and its sources carefully yet, and I am open to being convinced differently. Hopefully more people will participate there. I have learned a lot by following AFDs; you might consider browsing and participating in more of them. The ongoing AFDs are linked from a template near the top of the wp:AFD page. You can see how you are doing in AFDs (or at least how well your views agree with others') at wp:AFDSTATS. Anyhow, I hope you stay active and keep up your good work. Cheers, --do ncr am 02:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hello, I noticed you put an articles for deletion notice on Moxie Media scandal. However, you didn't complete the process by creating a discussion page and adding it to the daily log. I've removed the notice for now, but you may put it back by following the steps at WP:AFDHOWTO. Thanks. clpo13_(talk) 22:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not permissable to use the WP:PROD process on an article that has already been through an AFD. You must have been aware of the AFD since you were the nominator. PROD is for completely uncontroversial cases where nobody at all has objected to the deletion. SpinningSpark 10:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Spinningspark - since this is an issue of ignorance and lack of experience perhaps you could suggest next steps? I Tried to add the 2nd per clpo13's AFDHOWTO but could not figure out where to add it. I'm learning. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seeger7 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am surprised that you cannot work out the process, since you successfully completed the first AFD nomination. Please explain explicitly what you are not able to do. Also, please stop posting on the old closed debate. You are not supposed to do this (because it is closed) and no one is listening there anyway. SpinningSpark 22:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To nominate an article for deletion a second time, place {{subst:afdx|2nd}} at the top of the article. Then follow the rest of the steps at WP:AFDHOWTO as listed. The debate page for this second discussion will be at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moxie Media scandal (2nd nomination). Alternately, you can install WP:TWINKLE via your preferences page, which makes nominating pages for deletion much easier. clpo13_(talk) 22:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natalie Khawam (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Natalie Khawam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Natalie Khawam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seeger7! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]