User talk:Shogun902

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Shogun902, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 04:21, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Manikarnika: The Queen of Jhansi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"This is the most credible box office portal for Bollywood films"

Re: this and this and this, consider this an official warning that you don't get to unilaterally decide what "the most credible box office portal" is for Bollywood films. Anyone even casually familiar with Indian film financial details knows to take every reported figure with a grain of salt, since all of the financial figures are estimations and not indisputable fact. And in cases were multiple reliable sources report different figures, the academically honest thing to do would be to present the various figures in the form of a range, not to decide of your own volition what the "correct" guess is. Don't do this again. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:26, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This edit seems even more obnoxious to me, because the previous reference claimed a budget of 25 crore including print and advertising costs, which across the world are never considered part of the film's budget. Budget = cost of producing the film. You add BOI, with a higher figure, and I guess you don't even consider whether or not that higher figure includes print and advertising costs? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:45, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]