User talk:Smita Patil PSP

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hi Smita Patil PSP! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. VViking_TalkEdits 16:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. Please let me know exactly what "disruption" I caused. So that I can fix it. Smita Patil PSP (talk) 16:36, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should first read WP:COI, adding non-notable names across Wikipedia, especially one that you are trying to create an article on, makes it appear that you are trying to create a notable individual by including them in Wikipedia, instead of having a person become notable first and then having non-connected editors add that individual to Wikipedia. You may also want to review WP:BIOFAMILY--VViking_TalkEdits 16:43, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

→ You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ...You also should not be logging out to add in the information again. --VViking_TalkEdits 16:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

very very disappointed sir. Very much. Not acceptable. All the information I added about Vinayak Singh Oberoi is 200% true. The films he acted in, the autobiography, the list of Indian actors and Philanthropist profile.. you deleted all albeit adding numerous citations. Please give a valid reason. Not acceptable. Smita Patil PSP (talk) 02:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 16:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disappointed. Not even got a reply.

Very very disappointed sir. Very much. Not acceptable. All the information I added about Vinayak Singh Oberoi is 200% true. The films he acted in, the autobiography, the list of Indian actors and Philanthropist profile.. you deleted all albeit adding numerous citations. Please give a valid reason. Not acceptable. Smita Patil PSP (talk) 16:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Funny, it took you two days to add a comment and then you are disappointed when I do not respond the same day. You apparently have not read the information I have already provided. Please read and understand the information already provided to you. Thank you,VViking_TalkEdits 16:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Smita Patil PSP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I am extremely sorry. I got carried away in editing. I shall never be doing so again. I am new to Wikipedia that's why I did this. Sorry.

Decline reason:

You will need to address what you did and why you did it. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Smita Patil PSP (talk) 16:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

Request reason:

Your reason here I am extremely sorry. I got carried away in editing. I shall never be doing so again. I am new to Wikipedia that's why I did this. Sorry. I edited too many pages together. I am really sorry. But the information I added wasn't wrong. It was not. Just citation was not there. Please. Smita Patil PSP (talk) 02:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uma Dhar draftified

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Uma Dhar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Uma Dhar where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I blocked User:2409:4060:E9C:946B:0:0:0:0 who admitted to evading this user's block on my talk page. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help

@Goldsztajn as you've been assigned my mentor, please help me out with this Sir. Sir, I have many many questions. Please help me out.

1. I created pages 'Mohini Mohan Dhar' and 'Uma Dhar' At first both of them got approved. More than one editors came and did whatever corrections are required and published it.

2. Suddenly, an editor, this morning, came and Removed the Uma Dhar page to Draft albeit other editors approving the page. Why? Please remove it from Draft Sir.

3. Thirdly, I also created a Page 'Vinayak Singh Oberoi' which initially was published, but later got scheduled for deletion. Now, this morning, I find many editors coming and adding references to the page Vinayak Singh Oberoi and making it better. So, what is the point in making it better if it is scheduled for deletion? I can't understand Sir. Please help.

Please. It's my earnest request. Please help me. Smita Patil PSP (talk) 03:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - you appear to be blocked because you are creating articles on subjects which are not notable by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you wish to be unblocked you need to clearly explain that you understand these; not just by repeating them, but by showing you understand why the articles have been moved to draft space or have been nominated for deletion. In order for a subject to be notible it must have significant coverage in reliable sources, looking at the articles you created, much of the sourcing does not appear to be reliable. You can appeal to be unblocked, but editing via IP to evade the block will not help you convince editors that you will respect Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 08:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Sir. But then why did the articles get accepted at first? Like- Uma Dhar article- for accepted at first. Many other editors came and edited it also. But suddenly David Eppinstein drafted it. Why? Also regarding the page Vinayak Singh Oberoi- I saw many editors trying to save this page by adding references etc. But, this page is up for deletion. Can any editor please stop that? Please Smita Patil PSP (talk) 08:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by an article being "accepted". Any editor can create an article, but equally, any editor, in good faith, can question whether that article is notable. Editing an article or adding sources, does not by itself make a subject notable. There must be multiple sources which are reliable and contain significant coverage of the subject. If an article is determined not to be notable under Wikipedia's guidelines, or is against policy, then it will be deleted. Any editor can contribute to a discussion when an article has been nominated for deletion. However, you have sought to evade your block and ignored the advice being given to you regarding Wikipedia's criteria for notability. If you wish to continue editing, please work on demonstrating you understand the policies and guidelines regarding notability. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 14:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help 2.

@Mpian Sir, as you had edited the page created by me- Uma Dhar. Not only you, many other editors also did the same and made it better But suddenly, an editor came and removed it from article to Draft albeit other editors approving it Why? Please help Sir. Please Smita Patil PSP (talk) 03:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help 3

Sir, I have many many questions. Please help me out.

1. I created pages 'Mohini Mohan Dhar' and 'Uma Dhar' At first both of them got approved. More than one editors came and did whatever corrections are required and published it. 2. Suddenly, an editor, this morning, came and Removed the Uma Dhar page to Draft albeit other editors approving the page. Why? Please remove it from Draft Sir. 3. Thirdly, I also created a Page 'Vinayak Singh Oberoi' which initially was published, but later got scheduled for deletion. Now, this morning, I find many editors coming and adding references to the page Vinayak Singh Oberoi and making it better. So, what is the point in making it better if it is scheduled for deletion? I can't understand Sir. Please help. Please. It's my earnest request. Please help me. Smita Patil PSP (talk) 04:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt

@VoortsSir, I have many many questions. Please help me out. 1. I created pages 'Mohini Mohan Dhar' and 'Uma Dhar' At first both of them got approved. More than one editors came and did whatever corrections are required and published it. 2. Suddenly, an editor, this morning, came and Removed the Uma Dhar page to Draft albeit other editors approving the page. Why? Please remove it from Draft Sir. 3. Thirdly, I also created a Page 'Vinayak Singh Oberoi' which initially was published, but later got scheduled for deletion. Now, this morning, I find many editors coming and adding references to the page Vinayak Singh Oberoi and making it better. So, what is the point in making it better if it is scheduled for deletion? I can't understand Sir. Please help. Please. It's my earnest request. Please help me. Smita Patil PSP (talk) 04:19, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohini Mohan Dhar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohini Mohan Dhar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohini Mohan Dhar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheSlumPanda (talk) 18:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]