User talk:Spicejohnson

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Spicejohnson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hotel Transylvania (film), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TheRealFennShysa (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hotel Transylvania (film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hotel Transylvania (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open Season 4

The article Open Season 4 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, pure speculation at this point. See WP:TOOSOON

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Open Season

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Open Season, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Category:Open Season films, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 20:51, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Open Season chronology

A tag has been placed on Template:Open Season chronology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 12:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boog and Elliot's Big Adventure

The article Boog and Elliot's Big Adventure has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film not yet filming. Fails WP:NOTFILM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 01:37, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Open Season films

A tag has been placed on Template:Open Season films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Season: The Timberline Games

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Open Season: The Timberline Games requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Da-drumer (talk) 20:46, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elliots Wonderful Woo-Hoo Adventure

The article Elliots Wonderful Woo-Hoo Adventure has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this exists. Google search brings up nothing.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 03:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Open Season (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Open Season films

Template:Open Season films has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:OpenSeasonSeries.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:OpenSeasonSeries.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Open Season 3 promotional poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Open Season 3 promotional poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Open Season films

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Open Season films, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 05:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template talk:Open Season film series

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template talk:Open Season film series, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 12:47, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, this template isn't unnecessary. For example, Kung Fu Panda 's film templates doesn't have enough information and it's neceessary, so why should Open Season shouldn't be the same way? Also, that Open Season: The Timberline Games link, IT'S REAL!! It's an online game you can find on the internet! and you call it an unreferenced rumor and why Boog and Elliot's Big Adventure is on the Sony Pictures Television article when it isn't real? You know what MikeWazowski?, you're just judgemental and that's why I hate Wikipedia: You revert my edits, you've blocked me from editing, and I'm just pissed right now. Spicejohnson (talk) 11:11, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other editors disagree with you - which is why it was deleted multiple times. Also, not only is Boog and Elliot's Big Adventure NOT on the Sony Pictures Television article, even if it was, you can't use another Wikipedia article as a reference. And for the record, *I* never blocked you - that was an administrator who had (apparently) had enough of your disruptive editing. MikeWazowski (talk) 03:26, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Illumination Entertainment

Template:Illumination Entertainment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. MikeWazowski (talk) 12:56, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing of various kinds, including, apart from the problems mentioned above, repeatedly creating articles which have been deleted. For example, you created Template:Open Season film series after Template:Open Season films had been protected because you recreated it after a deletion discussion had decided it should be deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is bullcrap! Spicejohnson (talk) 11:15, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hotel Transylvania (film)

The article Hotel Transylvania (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. "Upcoming" film with no reliable sources cited.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OH MY F*CKING GOD!!!!!COME ON!!!! Spicejohnson (talk) 11:18, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have made personal attacks on this page while blocked, continuing to do so even after you were warned and an attack was removed. Since this is not a suitable use of a talk page, your talk page access has been removed, and your block has been extended by another 4 days. I strongly urge you to think carefully about how you will edit when the block has expired. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:53, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You have also edited this page without logging in to get round the removal of talk page access. In order to prevent further block evasion this page has been protected from editing by new or unregistered users for the duration of the block. Please wait until your block expires. You could have used your talk page access to file an unblock request, but instead chose to abuse it, so you have lost that opportunity. When the block expires you will be welcome to make constructive contributions. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:PiratesTeaserPoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PiratesTeaserPoster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Sony Pictures Animation, you may be blocked from editing. MikeWazowski (talk) 13:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:19, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spicejohnson for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OpenSeasonSeries.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OpenSeasonSeries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for Abusing Multiple Accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ (t) (e) 23:56, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spicejohnson. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 12:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this block is because you have repeatedly evaded your block with multiple accounts. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 12:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OpenSeasonSeries.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OpenSeasonSeries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Columbia TriStar Animation" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect Columbia TriStar Animation and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 12 § Columbia TriStar Animation until a consensus is reached. From Bassie f (his talk page) 09:24, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]