User talk:Ssvlogs369

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Hello, SS Vlogs 369, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Thanks! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 15:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request to Module:Protection banner has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Ssvlogs369 (talk) 15:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protect my profile

Not done this is not a valid request about Module:Protection banner. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ssvlogs369, I am letting you know the only time that Admins Protects User pages and User Talk Pages if there is enough recent disruptive activity but in your request well there was Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Chip3004 (talk) 15:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to stress again, please remove the user boxes on your user page that say you have 10,000 edits, rollback, and new page reviewer rights. Thanks, Zippybonzo | talk 09:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to 100 edits Ssvlogs369 (talk) 10:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also please remove the boxes that say rollback and new page reviewer.Zippybonzo | talk 10:03, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Ssvlogs369 (talk) 10:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jithu Venugopal (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't look like lead roles at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jithu Venugopal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jithu Venugopal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ssvlogs369! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Moving items from Draft to mainspace when they are not ready prejudices their ability to remain live, makes them likely to be sent to WP:AFD Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kshanikam (2022 Malayalam film). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 11:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove file deletion tags from file description pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Kshanikam (2022 Malayalam film), you may be blocked from editing. Edits of this type may be considered vandalism. Pikavoom ^Talk 07:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jithu Venugopal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jithu Venugopal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jithu Venugopal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kshanikam (2022 Malayalam film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kshanikam (2022 Malayalam film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kshanikam (2022 Malayalam film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 10:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kshanikam (2022 Malayalam film) (2nd nomination)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kshanikam (2022 Malayalam film) (2nd nomination), is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pikavoom ^Talk 07:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vipin Das (Director) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vipin Das (Director), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). In addition notability is not justified as film director, might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 07:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vipin Das (Director)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vipin Das (Director), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vipin Das. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 12:20, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:SuhailShaji786 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SuhailShaji786. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:34, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]