User talk:StacyOnEarth

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome

Hello, StacyOnEarth, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. If you are looking for help, please do any of the following:

visit the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have
type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will answer your questions shortly
visit the directory of help pages

There are a lot of standards and policies here, but as long as you are editing in good faith, you are encouraged to be bold in updating pages. Here are a few links you might find useful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. Also, it would be a huge help if you could explain each of your edits with an edit summary. Again, welcome! --Evb-wiki (talk) 22:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Raw veganism, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Raw veganism. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. You need a reliable source that directly relates this to "raw veganism". SummerPhD (talk) 16:13, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teddy Vann

I reverted your edit to Santa Claus given that both sources don't seem to meet WP:RS. However, I do see there are a large number of Google hits for Vann and for the song mentioned. Unfortunately, Google hits aren't good enough for our notability criteria. I would suggest trying to create an article for Vann first. The fact that he's won a Grammy in itself would probably qualify him for a Wikipedia article. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]