User talk:Supermos

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, Supermos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! .ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι.^{( talk | contrib)} 03:18, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet

This account is definately a sockpuppet of Comanche cph, it has only edited Scandinavia and Talk:Scandinavia and only gets active when Comanche is blocked. --Bjarki 11:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am no sockpuppet!, Check my ip!!!! (Supermos 15:14, 16 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

"unblock Check my ip do it now i am not him this is all wrong!|IP Checking can only add technical weight to sockpuppet cases, not having matching IPs does not disprove sockpuppetry. The fact that you appear and start pushing exactly the same POV seems to give a very strong case for sock/meat puppetry

{{unblock|please there must be some way that i can prove that we are not the same person this is not KAFKA! There most be some way that I can clean my name where can I go to whom can I apeal, just because He and I posted on the same page does not mean we are the same person. And the fact That I posted BEFORE him should prove my case, check my ip what are you afraid of what is the major problem you will see his ip and you will see my ip then you can see how far apart the regions are and see if it is even possible that we are the same 2 people. Because on the 15th of july we both posted on the same day with 3 houers difference once you know both of our ips you can the calculate the distance between the 2 regions and see if it is even possible that we are the same person. Also I posted BEFORE him on the scandinavia article BEFORE!!!}}

And My first edit was BEFORE that user started editing the scandinavia page BEFORE! Someone really needs to chyeck my ip and do it now because we are not the same person (Supermos 15:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

HERE IS THE PROOF, CHECK MY IP ON THE 15TH OF JULY AND CHECK HIS IP ON THE 15TH OF JULY SEE WHERE BOTH IPS ARE LOCATED AND CALCULATE THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 2 REGIONS AND SEE IF IT IS EVEN POSSIBLE THAT WE ARE THE SAME PERSON (Supermos 16:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

OR EVEN BETTER HAVE US POST AT THE SAME TIME TO PROVE ONCE AND FOR ALL THAT WE ARE NOT THE SAME PEOPLE BECAUSE UNLESS WE ARE IN THE EXACT SAME CITY THEN THE IPS SHOULD BE DIFFERENT AND THAT WILL PROVE THAT WE ARE NOT THE SAME PERSON(Supermos 16:11, 16 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I am not him and we are not pushing the same thing there must be some way I can prove this, wikipedia is not a KAFKA book!!!!! (Supermos 16:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Look as I have said check my ip on the 15th of julu and check his ip calculate the distance between the 2 regions and see if it is even possible that we can be the same person (Supermos 16:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

There most be some way that I can clean my name where can I go to whom can I apeal, just because He and I posted on the same page does not mean we are the same person. And the fact That I posted BEFORE him should prove my case (Supermos 16:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

What technicall problems will be added by checking both of our ips? The only thing that it will be a problem for is the person who blocked me. Look check my ip check his ip check both of our ips and see where we are from. (Supermos 16:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

This is admin abuse of power I am not him! Look at my ip ande see which ip I use and where it is located and the look at his ip what is the problem I have edited many times now and you can look at my ip each and single time and he has made even more edits and look at his ip and you will see that they are not the same and most likely not even similar. This is clear admin abuse one admin says "ooo he has edited the same article so they must be the same person", Without a shred of proof. And fact is still fact Finland is not part of scandinavia the root of this problem. (Supermos 00:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

This is ridiculous there must be some way that I can prove that we are not the same person! I want my named cleared a full apology and this whole shit removed from my block log because we are not the same person and I want the admin blocked for an equall amount of time for this bullshit and the other admin who agreed with him and who wont even do an ip check request and just agrees and says ooo yes you edited the same article you must be the same person. Check my ip compare the regions we might not even be from the same country I am from Sweden!(Supermos 00:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Unblocked

I have unblocked you. You may not be a sockpuppet but you should know that edits like those you have done to the Scandinavia article will not be tolerated. Reaching a consensus on this matter was a time consuming process that has left pages of debate, your reverting and preaching now is unlikely to do anything except for creating hostility towards yourself. --Bjarki 18:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is you who goes agains consenus most people say exactly what Scandinavia is and you are trying to add wrong things. There are no official sources what so ever if there are show me them and i will rip them down because if they are the same as those so called links as before they are worth nothing. (Supermos 01:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

And I am going to report you for abuse of power. I am my own man I dont belong to anyone. (Supermos 01:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

This is the consenus version it is you who are going against it. Read the talk page and you will see the talk page prroves you wrong (Supermos 04:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

These are my edits or more correctly the version I revert to And you REMOVE it because it points out what scandinavia is and what the nordic countries are and you can not accept it.(Supermos 04:20, 18 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

The Scandinavian languages, Danish, Norwegian and Swedish, are mutually intelligible, the countries share a common history and have many cultural similarities.

Scandinavia differs from the Nordic countries, in that it excludes Iceland and Finland. Scandinavia plus Finland is sometimes referred to as Fennoscandia, though the term is rarely used.

The Nordic countries include Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway (including Svalbard), Sweden and associated autonomous territories (Åland, Faroe Islands and Greenland).

And you say they can not be tolerated the only thing that can not be tolerated is you and you admin abuse you and your threats against me. (Supermos 04:20, 18 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

"your reverting and preaching now is unlikely to do anything except for creating hostility towards yourself" This is correct hence why you need to be striped of your admin powers and you yourself blocked because you draged my name into the mud. Scandinavia is Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Scandinavians have similar languages. The Nordic countries are Scandinavia + Finalnd + Iceland and No amount of admin abuse from you will ever change this and the swedish national encyclopedia is what I base my facts on why dont you look into the icelandic national encyclopedia and see what they say. And you will see that you are WRONG. (Supermos 05:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Reversion warning

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. You have actually violated the three revert rule quite significantly, but as you don't appear to have been warned before, please consider yourself warned now. Your next revert will result in a block. -- ChrisO 23:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on your page. (Supermos 23:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I'd like to point out that whatever the disagreements over the article, edit warring simply isn't an appropriate way to resolve them. Please take the time to discuss the issues with the other editors on the article talk page. You may also wish to read Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. -- ChrisO 23:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on your talk page. (Supermos 23:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Violating the 3RR again just after you've been warned not to is not a good idea. -- ChrisO 00:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know Ididnt really break it but I do know that It can be seen as that. I never really revert exactlly, but I do very clearly see how the rule applies but that does not change for a fact what scandinavia is. Look at the article look at all the article around scandinavia they all say the same thing the nordic countries for example is a perfect example, or the scandinavia article itself below the war zone. But then you had one person who wanted to change one thing and add misinformation because it fits their views and one person reverted it then revert back and then it went out of control. (Supermos 00:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]