Jump to content

User talk:TripleVenom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Hello, TripleVenom, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

RfC mention

In the spirit of transparency and dispute resolution, I wanted to inform you that I started an RfC on Talk:Dr. Luke and mentioned you in it (see Talk:Dr._Luke#RfC_-_Should_section_header_mention_sexual_assault_allegations.3F). Please join the discussion. Thank you! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Please tell me how to report the page for review. As written it is heavily biased and I don't think you are being objective. Someone needs to review. It is a serious, serious allegation and being buried. TripleVenom (talk) 02:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Evergreen. How do I report the article for bias? I've been asking this question a long time and you haven't given an answer. It seems to me the article is crowded by editors who are biased in favor of Doctor Luke or who have a men's rights agenda. I think it is very important this be examined by other editors and admins, because the article simply doesn't match the content of mainstream and reliable sources reporting on the matter. You might not see it personally but I am telling you, this article has serious issues and I think your own bias may be getting in the way. If you are truly objective, rather than report me for essentially disagreeing with some of the other editors, bring in the third party elements of wikipedia that are supposed to help quality control. TripleVenom (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]