User talk:Velocxty98

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Draft

Please don't remove the comments on a draft that is submitted for review. I think you are going to find it very difficult to get the article through as it is. To be included as an article here, it must have multiple reliable sources that give it significant coverage. Reliable sources means mainstream sources that are vetted, not small blogs or specialty websites. This is true for all article at Wikipedia. After doing a cursory look, I could not find sources that would help you in this. Not every band is eligible for inclusion, only those that meet the same criteria for inclusion as all other article subjects. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:55, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dennis, thanks for the feedback. Apologies for deleting the comments, I've been copying and pasting from a word doc as it's a little easier on the eyes and overwrote the article (with comments) in it's entirety. Still new here, but I'm picking it up and learning. I think I find the vetting process for approved articles a little confusing as some of the standards can be viewed as open to interpretation and background knowledge on specific topics goes a long way in determining what qualifies as reputable. I do appreciate you being up front that you don't think the article will pass to save me time. I'm trying to find semi notable bands to make pages for, more specifically signed bands on larger indie or major record labels that have seen success but don't have a page. Being I've seen local level unsigned bands with 5-10 press articles from non reputable sources with approved, it's a bit unclear where the "line" is to pass an article. I'm sure everyone here has certain preferences on what they look for, but the inconsistency is a little disconcerting, especially when a lot of time can go into to something such as this. Thanks for being upfront though. Velocxty98 (talk) 01:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:CANTERVICE

Hello, Velocxty98. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CANTERVICE, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CANTERVICE

Hello, Velocxty98. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CANTERVICE".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]