Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrey Dakhovskyy

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:26, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andrey Dakhovskyy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable businessman. Articles looks like a resume and not an encyclopedic entity. It had two paragraphs that were copy/pasted from here which I have removed. The creator is likely an undeclared CoI paid editor. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:22, 4 August 2018 (UTC) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:22, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 11:52, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 11:52, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:15, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that this reads like a CV and after cutting the word "exclusive" out of Google searches, there's very little showing up about this person (a bot mention of this AfD on Reddit is the 15th result). No indication that this meets the WP:GNG. › Mortee _talk 00:11, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to find substantive coverage in reliable independent sources. Vanamonde (talk) 07:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete – He's been mentioned in a few independent articles like The Moscow Times, but he still appears to have little notability. Best if deleted, but there should be more arguments if possible. Redditaddict6 9 08:46, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.