Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Lucia

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Lucia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This digital artist does not meet our notability criteria per WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. A "before" search only reveals social media, listings, and user-submitted content, but no significant coverage in independent reliable sources, therefore WP:SIGCOV is absent. She is a younger emerging artist in a vast field so perhaps in 5 or more years her career may develop to substantiate an encyclopedia article, but not now, as it's WP:TOOSOON. I could not find any reviews of her work, or articles on her practice in newspapers, art magazines, academic journals nor in art history books; she does not yet seem to have a significant exhibition record, nor is her work found in the permanent collections of notable museums or national galleries. Bringing it here for the community to weigh-in on and decide through consensus. Netherzone (talk) 19:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Arts, Visual arts, Technology, Egypt, and Netherlands. Netherzone (talk) 19:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all I can find is an opera singer with the same name. Delete for lack of sources. Oaktree b (talk) 01:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No real assertion or evidence of notabilty. Sources all web-floss. Johnbod (talk) 02:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above discussion. I want to stress that there is not a single reliable source in the article right now, in violation of WP:SIGCOV, WP:BLP, and WP:PRIMARYSOURCES. She appears to be a run of the mill NFT artist. Bearian (talk) 19:16, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.