Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aremo Oba

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 04:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aremo Oba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. None of the references cited in the article are independent of the subject. The subject was a non-notable footballer before he became a businessman.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 18:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 18:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 18:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 18:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ Celestina007, I will suggest you take time and to go through the provided sources provided which are very dependent on the article and passes WP:GNG, the sources are from credible media houses. Also, consider the fact that the article is coming from Africa where we are now learning to put information in the press as a sources. Everything here is basically verbal. Geezygee (talk) 11:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.