Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BH Mallorca

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 06:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BH Mallorca

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable hotel. Cabayi (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Very non-notable. See also related AFD for Tito's, creator seems to be obsessed with the arrest of the owner of this hotel and that club, so clearly not contributed because the buildings are thought to be notable, but because the creator wants to publicise someone's arrest, therefore violation of WP:BLP. Mabalu (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 00:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Mabalu's reasonings that the article was created only for malice and to make innocent employees feel unneeded wrath from the arrest. Nate • (chatter) 00:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The WP:BLP aspects have been edited-out, but all that is left is a statement that the hotel exists. No evidence of notability presented or found. AllyD (talk) 06:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A Google News search finds some sources, but it looks like the majority may be unreliable/tabloid journalism, such as The Sun. Mz7 (talk) 21:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.