Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baint
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Ain't --JForget 01:41, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced neologism. Article had been prodded and seconded before the article creator contested the prod. Allen3 talk 13:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. freshacconcispeaktome 13:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Blatant neologism. Xymmax 14:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for the reasons stated above. Merenta 14:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; clear neologism. --Son 14:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as above. Possible redirect to ain't; I remember seeing "baint" or "bain't", meaning "am not" or "is not", as a dialect form in a number of older novels, including one byJ. Sheridan Le Fanu. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Alberon 15:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 16:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Redirect to Ain't of which it is a variant. RMHED 21:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Redirect Arrr. As young Smerdis yon said, bain't be nowt but an old-fangled form o' ain't. Grutness...wha? 00:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.