Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bornova Misketi

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and redirect to Muscat (grape). Although I agree with Amatulic that a grape variety most probably will be sourceable, the current article is unsourced and there seems therefore no verifiable content available for a merge. I therefore close this discussion as delete, leaving a redirect behind for convenience and that, depending on sources, can either be expanded into a real article, of information on this particular variety can be aded to Muscat (grape). Randykitty (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bornova Misketi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

outsourced, lacking notability Owais khursheed (talk) 13:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep an rename to Bornova Muscat, or merge with Muscat (grape). This is a wine grape, inherently notable with plenty of sources referring either to the English name or Turkish name, even in Google Scholar. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – The article is not verified. Kingjeff (talk) 00:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.