Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bus war

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Please defer merge related discussion to article talk. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Bus war

Seems to be a neologism with a good chunk of original research. The only source given doesn't even use the term "bus war." Non-verifiable neologism. --Wafulz 03:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - Needs clean-up, but a cursory Google search turns up a few reputable sources using the term prominently: South Manchester Reporter [1], icBirmingham.com [2] and the Beeb [3]. Caknuck 04:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, could use better formatting and an expanded references section. Smeelgova 04:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC).
• Merge and redirect to Bus deregulation. It is redundant with that article. Incidentally, both articles suck, and a merge could improve both by providing more information and context. The Bus deregulation article is in serious need of rewrite, referencing, and possibly renaming; whatever happens however, we DON'T need 2 articles that deal essentially with the same topic. The topic IS encyclopedic, but the final article needs serious work. --Jayron32 05:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge — as per User:Jayron32. Leaning more towards merge, though. -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 02:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.