Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherokee Records

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cherokee Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not notable. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unfortunately. Record labels should be inherently notable imho :) but, tis not to be. A WP:BEFORE search (in news outlets and the literature) indicates a lack of in-depth or persistent coverage in third-party reliable sources sufficient to pass WP:ORGCRIT. — fortunavelut luna 09:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment leaning delete. This kills me, of course. There is a listing for Cherokee Records [www.globaldogproductions.info/c/cherokee.html] at Global Dog Productions (one of the three "legacy" numerical discographies) which to me indicates notability. That said, a search on Billboard shows there were several Cherokee records from around the same time period, one in Ohio, one in Nevada, and an unrelated one from 1952 but I can't determine its location. Looking at the GlobalDog listing, there are a number of notable artists, and several issues but, I believe this listing combines several unrelated labels of the same name, and only the 500 series is the label pertinent to this discussion, which would indicate perhaps only three singles were issued. The only reference I can find that truly satisfies WP:V is "Cherokee+Records". 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 19:07, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.