Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cigarro & Cerveja

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep per WP:WEB, criteria #3. нмŵוτн τ 02:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cigarro & Cerveja

Webcomic that fails WP:WEB because there doesn't appear to be any independent coverage. The Alexa ranking of its website is around 500,000 (just below "No Data"). szyslak 05:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a tough call (for me) on the notability guidelines due to the fact that the Subject was a print-newspaper strip FIRST and was collected into several books. Evilkeen (talk) 09:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OTOH, the newspaper it appeared in is a twice-weekly college newspaper. szyslak 09:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Hiding T 14:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. —Hiding T 15:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:WEB. Has been distributed independently, namely the university newspaper. These two links also provide sources which could be used in the article. [1] and [2]. Hiding T 15:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:WEB, criteria #3. A college newspaper is still a newspaper and still counts as independent media. If there is a book published, then so much the better. Ig8887 (talk) 12:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I remember seeing two different print books in a couple local stores Evilkeen (talk) 14:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, we don't need an article on a college newspaper strip with a web site and no reputable independent sources. --Dragonfiend (talk) 06:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.