Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Dove
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tyrenius (talk) 02:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article was originally listed for CSD. I think that there is enough information here that I was not comfortable arbitrarily deleting it. There are plenty of resources for this guy and I found a sufficient number of Ghits, however I haven't found any information on him that asserts notability. Trusilver 04:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly a solid professional practicioner and teacher, but this does not justify an article by itself. Johnbod (talk) 13:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. The 2006 solo exhibit at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Cleveland seems to be the best of his accomplishments, and I don't think it's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:46, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete promising but needs more. - Modernist (talk) 00:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.