Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devendra Rajesh Kothe

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. No valid rationale for deletion presented. WP:CSD#A10 does not apply. Existing content in the draft can be added into this article. Nthep (talk) 19:07, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Devendra Rajesh Kothe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's already a page created with the same name since 20th-November-2024, with much detailed research and details.

This is the page to discuss why this new page need to be allowed over the old page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Devendra_Kothe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohit Gandmal (talk • contribs) 12:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (WP:SNOW) — a draft article existing is not a reason to delete an article. If the draft is accepted the two articles can be WP:MERGEd, but much of the content in the draft is improperly sources and/or non-notable details. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Ahecht!

As per the Wikipedia rules.

Duplicate: There are two or more pages on exactly the same subject, with the same scope.

If a duplicate article was recently created, it may also be a candidate for speedy deletion under CSD A10 criteria.

WP:MERGEREASON

WP:OVERLAP

WP:DUP

We can abandon the discussion altogether if we collectively are not willing to abide by the original Wikipedia rules.

Logically, we should also get it clear that, does the arbitration favours the duplication or keeping up the original article, which has been put so much effort in to.

If duplication is what we are supporting above, what's already framed rule, then we should abandon the discussion altogether. Mohit Gandmal (talk) 15:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mohit Gandmal CSD A10 does not apply to drafts. WP:MERGEREASON/WP:OVERLAP/WP:DUP does not require a page to be deleted, especially when one of the pages is a draft. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.