Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Ballantine

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Ballantine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. Nothing found to offer for the consideration of notability per the inclusion criteria JMWt (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I cannot really find any coverage.

🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 15:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Two different search engines only bring up listings for the compilation album That's Not Funny, That's Sick when searchin' "Dick Ballantine" with "National Lampoon." Lookin' through different databases, which catalog pages n' pages about National Lampoon in all its forms, Dick Ballantine doesn't turn up any results at all. If we wanted to be nice, we could redirect to That's Not Funny, That's Sick or The National Lampoon Radio Hour, but given that the character ain't particularly described in either article, deletion would make more sense. ~Judy _{(call it in!)} 15:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to The National Lampoon Radio Hour. Note that while this may have insufficient sourcing for a standalone article, it need not be notable to be included as part of that article. Jclemens (talk) 22:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Doesn't even meet WP:V, let alone WP:SIGCOV. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.