Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Kalsaas

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emil Kalsaas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets WP:NFOOTBALL due to a single ten-minute substitute appearance in an allegedly 'fully professional league'. The rest of his short football career has been at a much lower level and there is no evidence of any WP:GNG-level coverage. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets NFOOTBALL and is a young player with ongoing career. We have traditionally given those players more leeway, and I see nothing to depart from that here. Giant Snowman 21:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the individual has not yet meet GNG. That is the minimum requirement for all articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per GS. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I see no reason to delete a player that has very recently passed the NFOOTBALL threshold, if he makes no further appearances in the next, say, seven years then, maybe, this should be put up for deletion Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.