Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erling Braut Håland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Erling Braut Håland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator based on an unverified claim that the Norwegian second division is fully professional. (See WP:FPL.) Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 02:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 02:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To meet the relevant notability guideline, a footballer must have actually played (i.e. in an actual match) in a fully pro league. While Haland is signed to Molde, he has yet to play for them. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting the article now seems unnecessary, I *presume* he is going to play when the season starts, and then the page would be re-created. If he doesn't play by October, delete it then? Power~enwiki (talk) 08:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Because we don't create articles in anticipation of notability. Otherwise you could create an article on anything on the promise that it will be notable in the future. This player has done nothing to be notable yet, he may do in the future, he may not. If he does then the article can be readily restored. Fenix down (talk) 09:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. As at the moment, he's apparently not played a game for his current club, which means he's not yet met the second criterion for NFOOTY. The season seems to be underway, so there's every chance he will do, but right at the moment he's just below the bar, rather than above it. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 03:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.