Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairways at Forsgate

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 01:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fairways at Forsgate

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. I couldn't find any reliable sources on that topic. Blackbombchu (talk) 01:34, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Blackbombchu (talk) 01:36, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:24, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, absolutely classic WP:MILL stub of a suburban New Jersey development. Also fails my standards for housing developments. Bearian (talk) 18:29, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete / Redirect to Monroe Township, Middlesex County, New Jersey Nothing here constitutes a claim of notability, no meaningful sources in the article and none found in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 19:02, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete instead as there's simply no improvement here. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing to suggest this is a notable development. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 22:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.