Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fruit Items In Pac-Man
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 05:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fruit Items In Pac-Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Simply a list of all the fruit items in every Pac-Man game. No room for growth, and nothing to expound on. In addition, Wikipedia is not a game guide. Hemlock Martinis 07:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If nothing else the fruit varies from format to format so this will just end up being a list of fruit. At best it can live in Pac-Man if it's really that needed. Doesn't need seperate article. Pedro | Chat 09:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Another useless "list"? -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 11:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per WP:NOT#DIR, the only connection these items have is that a game used them all, they have no unique intrinsic relationship to each other. Burzmali 14:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a game guide. JIP | Talk 17:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with merge/redirect to Pac-Man. Useless list that doesn't need to be alone and can be easily integrated (if not done) in sections about the rules or game playing of Pac-Man.--JForget 23:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No need to merge this to Pac-Man, as we are not a game guide. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Pac-Man, as suggested by JForget. Why not merge? Maybe Wiki shouldn't be a game guide, but Pac Man was a billion dollar (or four billion quarters) industry, and no ordianry video game. Mandsford 01:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, it was a groundbreaker, but given the tone of the article, including the detailed scoring of each game item is probably superfluous - the article is not so much about game play, as it is the phenomenon surruounding the game. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Of what possible use could this be to anyone? Captain Infinity 23:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Often times I try to say merge instead of delete but this really is hardly anything worth doing, so delete. -WarthogDemon 23:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.