Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grokline (2nd nomination)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Groklaw#Additional projects. postdlf (talk) 16:07, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grokline

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created to support a non-notable, short lived free software project. damiens.rf 10:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. (I created the page in 2004, fwiw). --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:27, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:52, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:52, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:54, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (or failing that, Merge and redirect to Groklaw). The article was not created to support a free software project; it was created to document it in an encyclopaedic manner. The fact that the software package no longer exists does not detract from its original notability.Vulcan's Forge (talk) 04:30, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Groklaw#Additional_projects - refs provided are non-independent, and a search turned up no independent, significant WP:RS coverage. Related project appears notable, so redirect there is reasonable.Dialectric (talk) 19:44, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 03:15, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above. Џ 04:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.