Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD (commentator)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 00:07, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HD (commentator)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not think this meets WP:BIO The MLG source is not at all independent, the Youtube page is of course not viable. NPR is fairly decent, but it's a fairly passing mention, even though he is talked to, and it's only one source. The Fourth one is another MLG source, and the last source from thecpl is not at all neutral or established. I don't see enough to satisfy WP:GNG NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 06:11, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:47, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:47, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Reach Out to the Truth 20:54, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep The NPR source is good, and it's not clear to me that the CPL source is bad. The old Cyberathlete Professional League was a significant organization in professional video gaming (we have an article on them), and this appears to be the official news channel of their successor. However, it's not at all clear what the successor organization is. So, based on the one good article and the general buzz of borderline other material, I'm not comfortable deleting at this time. But I won't consider it a great tragedy if it happens. gnfnrf (talk) 03:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found a PC Gamer podcast interview with Alex. --生け花 00:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the NPR source clearly demonstrates notability. This figure is probably the first or second most respected Starcraft II caster in the English Language. --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:22, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article utilizes multiple independent reliable sources that help establish enough notability for an article. No reason why it shouldn't be kept. Artichoker^[talk] 07:48, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.