Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartfield Academy

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 03:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hartfield Academy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Did a quick search and could not find sources to satisfy WP:GNG. UnnamedUser (talk) 03:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. UnnamedUser (talk) 03:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. UnnamedUser (talk) 03:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There's tons of trivial mentions out there (mostly athletic scores, etc.), so a proper WP:BEFORE is quite difficult. The current article is very poorly sourced. But there does seem to be enough out there to pass WP:GNG. This, this is more in-depth, even if an athletic article, even some tv coverage, this, and this. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Even the most simple Google on the school name and the road give results . One building renovation architect gives enough material for an article. I query whether 'I did a quick search' shows sufficient diligence to disprove notability WP:NEXIST?ClemRutter (talk) 12:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Going by the keep statements above, the sources do exist that would satsify WP:GNG even though the search engines bring up mostly athletic news. One particular source not related to atheletics would be the partnership between the school in question and Belhaven University which disproves WP:NEXIST. I also want to mention that I have made some changes to the article in question, so some improvements can be made over time. Shadowhen89 (talk) 03:26, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - As it stands, it merits a weak keep, but I'll bet if we dig into history under the previous name, a wealth of information might be found. John from Idegon (talk) 12:47, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I found a pdf on the school's previous name. Although the pdf only shows a list of schools, the previous name has its own "previous name." To point the name out, University Christian School, the school's previous name, has its own previous name, which is Brandon Academy. To add more, I found sources, which are football records, on the previous names Brandon Academy and University Christian School; however, both schools do not have complete records, which the records may contain errors such as the year of name change to Hartfield Academy. The sources could possibly satisfy WP:GNG. Shadowhen89 (talk) 02:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.