Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heralds of Harmony
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Heralds of Harmony (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication that this group meets WP:NMUSIC. Swayback Maru Mufka's alternate account (talk) 19:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - local group with local coverage. Lots of concert announcements can be found, and some local coverage like this, but not enough for me to say it meets inclusion. -- Whpq (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 15:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Appears to meet wp:notability, appears to be rw notable, and existence of more suitable sources is likely. North8000 (talk) 16:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Relisting comment: AfD wasn't transcluded to a new log after previous relists.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —SW— prattle 02:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this group is important to some people and has reliable sources. MathewTownsend (talk) 02:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Local notability, at least, is clear from the sources, and the sources also make note of the group's national and international activity. On balance, it seems like this group is significant enough to have a place in Wikipedia's impressively extensive coverage of barbershop music. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.