Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermitcraft

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hermitcraft

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't think this meets WP:GNG. Most of the sources listed at the time of nomination are not reliable (YouTube, Hermitcraft.com, Minecraft.net). ~~Gampur maybe (?) might meet it, but not significant enough to meet the criteria.~~ EDIT: per Sergecross73, that makes it all of the listed sources not reliable.

Looking up on Google, there are only 6 results returned for the News section, many of which I do not find reliable, including Metro (see WP:RSP#Metro), and the sources that otherwise are only mentions Hermitcraft in passing. theinstantmatrix (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC) edited 16:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. theinstantmatrix (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. theinstantmatrix (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Gamepur isn’t an RS either. Sergecross73 msg me 23:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, just notable enough to warrant an article of its own, it may not be large in terms of player count, but the community is very active and dedicated. The article is being kept updated with the latest seasons, too. >>BEANS X2^t 07:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC) >>BEANS X2^t 15:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That WP:ITSPOPULAR and WP:LOOKSGOOD is not a reason to keep an article, BEANS X2. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 09:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Popularity and fan enthusiasm are not valid reasons for keeping an article. (And even if it was, you didn’t cite or quantify anything.) Sergecross73 msg me 10:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A total of three hits on the custom WP:VG/RS Google search engine: two of which are forum posts and one is a user-submitted blog. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 09:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I cant find any evidence that it meets the WP:GNG. All current sourcing is first party or obscure blogs. Sergecross73 msg me 16:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.