Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Lewison
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 22:21, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ian Lewison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Boxer who doesn't come close to meeting WP:NBOX or WP:GNG. He's currently not even ranked among the top 10 heavyweights in the UK, much less in the world. The article's only source is a link to his fight record. The article consists of a one line statement saying he is a professional boxer. There are no claims of notability and nothing to show he meets any notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 20:47, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 20:47, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable boxer and lacks significant independent coverage.Mdtemp (talk) 14:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NBOX, and after a little searching I couldn't find any coverage to get him close to passing WP:GNG. CaSJer (talk) 14:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.