Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Giorgio
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 6 July 2005 01:08 (UTC)
Notability not established, a req. for explanation tag had been on the article for several weeks. Perhaps vanity. Delete Abstain. Mr Bound 17:17, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Not a very good article yet, but a quick search indicates that the subject is a former police detective who became an author and Hollywood consultant and well known enough in his field to be referred to by the nickname indicated on several web sites. --Tysto 19:21, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
- Delete Minor Hollywood consultant 200 google hits- no further information after several weeks request.--Porturology 03:19, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Weak keep but only if expanded. If he's a published author then that satisfies notability - but let's have some titles. And if he can be linked to any film or TV productions, great. If it stays an unexpanded stub, it can go. 23skidoo 04:31, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete minor consultant, agree with Porturology (even if my dogs wears sunglasses). JamesBurns 04:51, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Doesn't establish notability, delete. --W(t) 05:01, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)
- Delete: No information presented at all. He was a cop is all the article tells us. We delete articles, not topics. A proper article on the guy may or may not be possible (200 Google hits is tiny, but there may be hidden depths that an expert author could give). The "article" looks -bot made at best. Geogre 05:25, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.