Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joakim Hagabakken

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 22:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joakim Hagabakken

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Technically passes WP:NFOOTBALL due to two brief substitute appearances in the 2001 Tippeligaen, which is currently on our list of 'fully professional leagues' (despite not being fully professional at the time). Fails WP:GNG. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Valeranga one of the strongest and most definitely professional teams in a professional league. Abcmaxx (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that it doesn't look like he got any game time for Vålerenga Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one (or two) appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively. If sources are found which demonstrate GNG then please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a total and complete failure of both GNG and football notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - only bare minimum 'database' coverage found in searches; some of the clubs that he played for are indeed notable but there is nothing to suggest that Hagabakken is a notable enough individual to pass WP:GNG in his own right Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.