Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jones!
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jones! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely fails WP:GNG in any sense of the guidelines without question. After some searching, I couldn't find any reliable sources that would support its notability, not to mention the article itself has no sources. It's just not a notable TV channel, end of story. Kuchi Kopi (talk) 11:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New Zealand. Shellwood (talk) 13:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It's just a channel of acquired programming. Not even sure if it worth a redirect. Ajf773 (talk) 10:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.