Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Goodwin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 08:01, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Laura Goodwin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't satisfy the criteria detailed at WP:CREATIVE (which includes journalists), hasn't been widely cited by peers or successors, no new concepts/techniques/major roles/critical attention or significant contributions. ƒ(Δ)² 09:19, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to STV News at Six as an unsourced BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure even a redirect is supported. The original version of this article, equally as without sources as the current one, pointed to a completely different television programme. I cannot find anything anywhere that documents this person's life and works, even a source which reliably states up-to-date information as to which television programme this person is currently associated with, and thus which article would be the proper redirect target. The only thing that I've found is a fluff piece in a gossip column about how this person was proposed to. Even that doesn't state the television programme. The world has simply not documented this person. The PNC is not satisfied. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Uncle G, no opinions on redirecting. GlassCobra 15:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.