Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leigh Landy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 17:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Leigh Landy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable biography. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources.. RadioFan (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I declined the speedy as the article asserts significance or importance, but at the time I wasn't sure if it would survive AFD. However I've now googled him and added one of the links that I found and IMHO he meets WP:ACADEMIC clause 8 as editor of Organised Sound. Plus with his publications and citations in various places including Wkipedia he probably meets other criteria as well. ϢereSpielChequers 19:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I was informed a few days ago that academics with more than a couple of published books are notable, he fits. Drawn Some (talk) 22:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If Radio Fan keeps nominating adequate articles like this I will be filing an ANI about him. Dr. Blofeld White cat 11:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn Initial article did not give much indication of notability and references weren't easy to find on this subject but sufficient references have been added to indicate notability. --RadioFan (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.