Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liusha River (fictional river)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Journey to the West. Merge any relevant content, then delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liusha River (fictional river)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a WP:COATRACK of trivial WP:PLOT details, with no significant coverage in reliable third party sources. The only coverage provides trivial mentions, and not WP:SIGCOV as required by the WP:GNG. Brought this one to PROD and was turned down, so I am raising it for discussion here. Jontesta (talk) 01:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 01:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems like a minor detail from the Journey to the West, so trivial (plot summary only) that it is not worth redirecting. Ping me if better sources are found, so I can be color suprized. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Journey to the West. Liusha River (fictional river) is a short article with ample citations and I assume the merge can be done without introducing an WP:UNDUE issue. ~Kvng (talk) 14:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Piotrus as not being covered in any meaningful way in reliable independent sources, failing the WP:GNG. Too trivial to be summarized but would not object to a redirect, with the outside possibility it can be merged or expanded at the main article. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.