Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Grand Albania

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the main notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 07:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Grand Albania

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local version of a pageant that fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 11:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI The Banner a national event is not a "local" event. Is Miss America a local event? —Мандичка^YO 😜 13:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just show me the reliable, independent sources needed conform WP:RS. What is needed are sources about the pageant itself. You have spend a load of words without proving that the pageant is notable. The Banner talk 17:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't change the fact that it's not local like you wrote. Why do you "spend" an extra word that's not true? —Мандичка^YO 😜 21:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prove it with reliable source, mate. The Banner talk 22:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 01:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it not a "local version", it's a national beauty pageant, and has a lot of sources. Passes WP:GNG Kraxler (talk) 18:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Most sources fail WP:RS. The Banner talk 10:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 06:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Kraxler —Мандичка^YO 😜 08:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: "Miss Grand" is the prefix going on here. The article makes clear that this pageant is not part of the Universe or Miss pageants. Therefore, "Grand" is ostensibly the sponsor. So, who or what is that sponsor? Why is that sponsoring agency significant and major? How is this pageant, first held last year, notable? We need reliable sources, not primaries. Until then, fails RS notability and appears to be promotional. Hithladaeus (talk) 19:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - No evidence of notability fails ORG + GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Another fancruft-article related to Miss Grand International that is sourced only to Facebook, Youtube, blogs, forums, personal websites and dead links. A pattern that I can see in all articles related to Miss Grand International that I have checked so far. Thomas.W ^talk 22:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.