Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motion-Twin

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This does not mean the article should not be cleaned up. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 23:46, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Motion-Twin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally tagged this for speedy deletion under WP:A7, but then I noticed the claim that their game Twinoid has a community of 15 million registered users, which arguably indicates significance. However, there still seems to be no indication of notability, as none of their games or awards have articles and there are no references. IagoQnsi (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 23:26, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 23:29, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It doesn't appear to be linked yet when I visited the enwiki page, but Google popped up with an article on frwiki: [1]. There appears to be 3-4 french language sources there that aren't self-published, may help in resolving AFD. -- ferret (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mild keep - Of the French article's sources, the only one that jumps out at me as a probable RS is Libération, but there seems to be some other RS coverage in English (like here at gameindustry.biz, and here at mcvuk, and some scholarly coverage at Google Scholar. Motion-Twin seems to be a pretty big player in the French video game scene so we should probably be focusing on French sources like jeuxvideo.com, etc. -Thibbs (talk) 05:08, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mush (video game) has an article, but it was located at Mush (computer game). I moved it. That article has fairly substantial coverage, but some is in French. I think there is more coverage to be found under "Twinoid", the name of the company's big social-network game. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 13:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Subject is probably notable. However the article is ridiculously over-detailed and promotional. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. There is just way too much in this for an article with no sources. It needs to be cut down to a stub until RS sources are added. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.