Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick DiGiovanni

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G5. Any editor in good standing is free to re-create the page. ✗plicit 14:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nick DiGiovanni

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO no WP:SIGCOV that meets qualifications. Only really known for being a reality show contestant. SanAnMan (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SanAnMan (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. SanAnMan (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He has gained a lot of popularity from YouTube, having around 2.4M subscribers. If the YouTube part can be added to the article then it can be eligible. YashPratap 1912 (CONT.) 03:51, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@YashPratap1912: YouTube channel added. Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 07:39, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep DiGiovanni i also ranked 6th in 2021 Forbes 30 Under 30 and i thinks that a big thing. and have 6.1 TikTok follower and also i didn't mentioned in the article that he also have 2.4million subscriber. Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 04:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG with weak sourcing. KidAd • SPEAK 01:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was invited on my talk page. This looks like a maybe. It is not helped by poor sourcing, including youtube. It is WP:Reference bombed. I invite someone to nominate the WP:THREE best sources for careful analysis. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Added more Citation and upgraded Infobox. Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 17:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 16:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Weak sourcing and only seems to be known for the one thing. That being said I don't know what the rules are for social media influencers. FiddleheadLady (talk) 18:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural note, I reverted an improper speedy keep close by the article creator.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 07:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:GNG and WP:BLP1E, I found coverage in the The Palm Beach Post here, WBZ (AM) here, and The Boston Globe here, all of which provide SIGCOV for seperate events, even if the latter article is somewhat short. Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.