Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikos Oikonomidis (violinists)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nikos Oikonomidis (violinists) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO. He has some records in the discography, but the only record company I've found is Oikonomidis MUSIC, presumably not a major record label. No indications of anything else that makes him notable. Sjö (talk) 14:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'd like to say Merge or Redirect, since there seems to be some non-RS which might indicate minimal notability, but there are no obvious targets to redirect or merge to. Only significant coverage appears to be in one blog-type article and a bio on a related artist's web site (the non-RS). Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Because anyone an add anything they want to Discogs, it is generally not considered a reliable source of information. Thanks for the information, though. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:26, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.