Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonna Agadzhanova

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 15:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nonna Agadzhanova

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject of this BLP, does not appear to meet GNG nor do I believe the page meets the criteria for FILMMAKER. J04n(talk page) 12:50, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:38, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:38, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:38, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also, TV news and film producers are all too common and rarely are considered notable. Finally, its does not take a lot of creativity to write a check or manage a bunch of talking heads. Bearian (talk) 16:03, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:41, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep sourced only to IMDB which has long been disallowed as a reliable source because one may buy the ability to list things and also because subjects can sometines self-list items. but a long list of credits. maybe get a real source or two and rework it. Cramyourspam (talk) 13:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm not sure where "a real source or two" is going to come from, I've spent time looking without success. J04n(talk page) 23:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:22, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undecided. Not much in Russian news media, nor in international news, and nothing in entertainment news. Although I found a Russian-language source here, so I am somewhat uncertain, may be a problem with difficulty with name spellings? But if I used what appears to be the Russian-letter spelling, filtered by Russian news (in English?) it turns up dry. Possible source here, plus a listing here. Not sure what to make of this.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No sources in 6 months, BLPPROD only denied on a technicality, it's a no-brainer. Bazj (talk) 20:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.