Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notability in the English Wikipedia

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Unfunny. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:47, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability in the English Wikipedia

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable. Jinkinson talk to me 02:35, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

^{[citation needed]} Citation Needed | Talk 02:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to WP:NOTE. And I may actually be serious on this one. Dough 48 72 03:15, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Wikipedia article on the notability article of Wikipedia does not in fact meet the notability requirements of Wikipedia, which has itself been nominated for deletion for failure to follow the notability policy of Wikipedia of which it itself is.Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Am I allowed to suggest that it be cross-namespace redirected? To WP:N? In all seriousness, I'm actually not entirely sure the mainspace article meets the standards in the location I've proposed it redirect to. - Purplewowies (talk) 07:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.